Thursday, September 20, 2007

Africa: The real target of America's war on Iraq

With a military base in Iraq America can strike at Africa and stop trade between Africa and China

In 1993 America failed to established a military base of operations on the eastern shore of Africa in Somalia. After being driven out by the African resistance led by Mohamed Farrah Aidid, the Americans plotted new ways to assert their power in the African region.

They used a new tactic in creating a phoney threat of "Islamic terror" and claimed that "terrorists" were based in Africa. Nations such as Sudan came under American attack but fortunately there were unable to gain the upper hand.

After staging the so-called 9/11 attack, America started a global campaign of hostility under the false pretense of fighting "terror". In 2001 America attacked Afghanistan and in 2003 Iraq was invaded by America. Iraq is a key target for the Americans since it can put them in a stronger positon to attack Africa in the future.

The American war-master who currently leads the war on Iraq is a General Petraus who is a descendant of the Roman invaders who raped Africa over a 1,000 years ago.


Das said...

you really are a very insecure person. not to mention extremely racist.

This site should be taken down!

Its people like you who hold back the Black population, not improve it!

Anonymous said...

This site is hilarious! Keep up the funny work.

Anonymous said...

ah, liberals!

Truth_First said...

There is nothing racist about telling the truth.

Anonymous said...

This blog is nothing but a racist white conspiracy to make black people look incredibly stupid.

Anonymous said...

So, America is really just biding it's time so we can take over Africa...but why? WTF is in Africa that we want?

Anonymous said...

Why would USA need a base in Iraq. Surely it would just ask one of many European countries that suck up to it.

Anonymous said...

I was wondering where your post came from over at! I love it when people plagarize themselves with year old posts on somebody else's blog, but hey, you use the tools at your disposal.


Anonymous said...

You complain that people call you Professor Red, but you have brought this on yourself. You have not told us your real name, and the only name you give us is one which people of integrity could never call you.

Take, for example, the issue (which has been mentioned many times) of that post in which you took a 300 year-old painting of Jesus and posted it, claiming it was 2,000 years old. Now, it was a pointless lie, since it proved nothing, but several of your readers found the SOURCE site where you got the picture, and thereby discovered your lie.

Since then, you have been asked why YOU who call yourself "TRUTH FIRST" would tell a lie like that, and you have repeatedly ignored the question. You do not apologize for your deception, you do not even say "I made a mistake."

In other words, you have made it impossible for any thinking person to ever call you anything involving the word TRUTH. Similarly, you can not be called a TEACHER, for teachers deal in truth.

If you will not tell us your real name, and we are too honest to call you by such deceitful names as "Truth First" and "Teacher", what choice do we have but to call you a name of our own choosing?

PS - Deleting the comment doesn't change the truth.

chenlina said...

ray ban sunglasses
adidas original trainers
oakley sunglasses
kd shoes
coach factory outlet
coach canada outlet
adidas superstars
louis vuitton outlet
toms outlet
oakley outlet
coach outlet online
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton handbags
mont blanc pens
uggs on sale
north face jacket
ray ban sunglasses
jordan 3 retro
oakley store
louis vuitton
louboutin pas cher
ghd hair straightener
abercrombie & fitch
uggs for men
coach factorty outlet
oakley sunglasses
coach outlet online
nike sb janoski
giuseppe zanotti outlet
kids lebron james shoes
oakley sunglasses
fitflops sale
jordan 8s
michael kors handbags
jordan retro 11
louis vuitton handbags
true religion jeans